Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Samuel Groth vs Mitchell Krueger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Groth vs Krueger analysis and find out who is favored!
Samuel Groth vs Mitchell Krueger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Groth 1 - 1 Krueger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Groth has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Krueger has won 52.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Groth, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Krueger has won 51.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Groth has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krueger has saved 58.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Groth has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Krueger winning 56.06% (W/L 37/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Groth has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 85/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 199/ 177). Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Groth winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Groth winning 2 and Krueger winning 3. The last match between Groth and Krueger was at the Tiburon Challenger, 25-09-2017, First, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Groth and Krueger have played a deciding set 1 times, with Groth winning 1 times and Krueger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Groth winning 0, and Krueger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Groth has played against opponents with an average rank of while Krueger has played against players with an average rank of 272.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Groth has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krueger has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Groth has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krueger has converted 40.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
53
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
251
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
57% (387-296)
Career Total W/L
53% (402-358)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
61% (22-14)
$650,305
Career Prize Money
$697,038
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Samuel Groth | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 25 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 20 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:36 | 1:31:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (82/141) | 66% (92/139) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (64/82) | 67% (62/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (26/59) | 51% (24/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (53/139) | 36% (51/141) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Mitchell Krueger
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 61% (22/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (51/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (457/421) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 163 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:58:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 323.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (1803/2766) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (1251/1803) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (501/963) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (108/266) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (1169/2939) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (21/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (22/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (16/24) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 14% (14/2) |
Samuel Groth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Manuel Sanchez
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
6 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Samuel Groth
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Aidan Mayo
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Groth Vs Krueger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mitchell Krueger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
